Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEDBETTER v. THE STATE.

PER CURIAM.

1. Grounds 1 through 5 of the enumeration of errors are founded upon a patent inaccuracy in the record which was corrected pursuant to Sec. 10 (f) of the 1965 Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 24; Code Ann. § 6-805 (f)) after the enumeration was filed. These grounds present nothing for consideration.

2. Ground 6 would require a consideration of the transcript of proceedings. However, the transcript was not filed within 30 days after filing the notice of appeal, and there was no extension of time applied for or granted. This court is therefore without jurisdiction to review this ground of the enumeration. Davis v. Davis, 222 Ga. 579 ( 151 S.E.2d 123); Benecke v. Boyer, 115 Ga. App. 99 ( 153 S.E.2d 668); Puckett v. Edmonds, 115 Ga. App. 776 ( 156 S.E.2d 151).

Appeal dismissed. Bell, P. J., Pannell and Whitman, JJ., concur.

ARGUED JULY 10, 1967 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 5, 1967.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEDBETTER v. STATE
(Sep 5, 1967)