Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Crescent Realty Investment Company Tax Assessment Case.

Taxation — Real estate — Allegheny County — Assessment — Uniformity of assessment — Ratio of assessed value to market value — Constitution of Pennsylvania — Article IX, § 1.

Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company Tax Assessment Case, 426 Pa. 566, followed.

Mr. Justice EAGEN dissented.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN, September 26, 1967:

This is an appeal by the Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review of Allegheny County (Board) from a decision regarding the proper assessment of property owned by Crescent Realty Investment Company for the triennium 1960, 1961 and 1962. In this case the issues are similar to those presented in the appeal of the Board in the case of property owned by Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company decided this day except that (1) an earlier triennium is involved and (2) no testimony regarding fair market value was offered by the Board.

The assessment here was $140,225; the taxpayer's two expert witnesses testified to a fair market value of $100,000 and $95,400; and the court below found the fair market value to be $100,000. It then reduced this figure to an assessment of $42,000 by application of the common level ratio of assessed value to market value found by Dr. Raymond Richman for the triennium beginning in 1960 of 42%.

The principles set forth in the Massachusetts Mutual case are equally applicable here. The order of the court below is affirmed.

Mr. Justice EAGEN dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRESCENT REALTY I. CO. TAX ASSESS. CASE
(Sep 26, 1967)