AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EVANS PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This patent infringement suit involves the validity of Patent No. 3,168,055 for a railroad freight-car bulkhead. We agree with the conclusion of the District Court that the alleged invention was obvious within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 103. See 275 F. Supp. 331. Therefore, the judgment invalidating this patent is affirmed.

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge (concurring):

I concur in the foregoing opinion because of the reasons stated therefor and also because the district court in its opinion distinguished the case of Copease Mfg. Co. v. American Photocopy Equipment Co., 7 Cir., 298 F.2d 772 (1961).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNARCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. EVANS PRODUCTS CO
(Oct 4, 1967)