Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Irby D. STEPHENS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant attacks a Dyer Act conviction ( 18 U.S.C. § 2312) for which sentence under the Youth Corrections Act ( 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b)) was imposed, allegedly without full disclosure by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence that could be imposed under that Act. The question seems to be the same as that presented by Marvel v. United States, 380 U.S. 262, 85 S.Ct. 953, 13 L.Ed.2d 960. On the basis of that decision, the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing as to whether appellant was misled by the trial judge as to the maximum sentence.

Vacated and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES
(Oct 6, 1967)