Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DANIEL JORDAN v. STATE OF MARYLAND.

APPEAL — Waiver Of Allegations Not Raised Below. Where appellant's contention as to the inadequacy of his court-appointed counsel had not been raised below, it was not properly before the Court of Special Appeals on appeal. Rule 1085. p. 415

Decided November 15, 1967.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Jordan was convicted of murder in the second degree in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, before Judge James A. Perrott sitting without a jury. Jordan, now, complains that he was deprived of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States because of inadequate court appointed counsel. This question was not raised below; therefore, it is not properly before this court, Maryland Rule 1085. We have repeatedly invoked this Rule in similar cases because, among other reasons, counsel has had no opportunity to defend himself.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JORDAN v. STATE
(Nov 15, 1967)