Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

NOMA FRATZEL v. RICHARD FRATZEL ET AL.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff brought this action against the named defendant and Margaret and Nicholas P. Galotti to recover damages for personal injuries sustained on June 13, 1964, when an automobile driven by the named defendant in which the plaintiff was a passenger was struck from the rear by an automobile owned by Margaret Galotti and driven by Nicholas P. Galotti. The case was tried to the court, which concluded that the collision was caused by the negligence of both operators, and it rendered judgment against all the defendants. The named defendant alone has appealed.

We have examined the record and have concluded that the named defendant is not entitled to, the changes in the finding requested by him and that the court could reasonably have concluded that he was negligent and that his negligence, as well as the negligence of Galotti, was a proximate cause of the collision, which resulted in injuries to the plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FRATZEL v. FRATZEL
(Nov 29, 1967)