Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NEIMAN v. NEIMAN.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

It appearing from the evidence submitted that the husband's reported income had been varying from $30,000 to $18,000 per year over a period of the last five years, although he had other funds available to him and was the owner of considerable interests in family corporations, and it was shown that the expenses of maintaining his family had been approximately $1,500 per month over a considerable period of time, the court did not err in making a temporary award of alimony totaling $1,200 per month for the wife and children, exclusive use of the home and maintenance of the status quo in regard to insurance as well as $500 for attorney fees. The award, under the evidence submitted, can not be said to be excessive or unreasonable.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED NOVEMBER 15, 1967 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 22, 1967.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEIMAN v. NEIMAN
(Nov 22, 1967)