Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARGARET FOLEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM W. ULRICH AND LOIS ULRICH,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Appellate Division.

For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For affirmance — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOLEY v. ULRICH
(Dec 4, 1967)