AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,CROSS-APPELLANT, v. VINCENT BUDNY AND BUDNY'S TIRE SERVICE,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Kilkenny in the Appellate Division, 93 N.J. Super. 235. Mr. Justice Proctor votes to reverse for the reasons given by Judge Goldmann in his dissenting opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 5.

For reversal — Justice PROCTOR — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WINDSOR CONTRACTING CORP. v. VINCENT BUDNY, ET AL
(Dec 22, 1967)