ROCHE v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Joseph V. Cullum for defendant-appellant. Mr. Joseph Coult for defendants-respondents ( Mr. Philip M. Lustbader, Messrs. Schneider Morgan, Messrs. Shenier Gilady, attorneys). Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf for the plaintiff-respondent ( Messrs. Nochimson, Irwin and Larsen, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Joseph V. Cullum for defendant-appellant. Mr. Joseph Coult for defendants-respondents ( Mr. Philip M. Lustbader, Messrs. Schneider Morgan, Messrs. Shenier Gilady, attorneys). Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf for the plaintiff-respondent ( Messrs. Nochimson, Irwin and Larsen, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

RITA ROCHE, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. ROCHE, DECEASED,PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FLORAL RENTAL CORP., ET AL., DEFENDANTS ANDTHIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 95 N.J. Super. 555.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, GOLDMANN, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.