PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
The objections to the receipt in evidence of fingerprints and handwriting exemplars of Gregory without Escobedo-Miranda warnings are not valid. Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908; Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; Lewis v. United States, D.C.Cir., 382 F.2d 817.
Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977; Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.
The objection about no Negro on the jury (one was called but was removed by a peremptory challenge) we reject. There was no timely challenge to the panel.
Other points, too, we find without merit.