Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Isidro Sanchez OCHOA, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728.

The grounds attempted to be presented in appellant's brief filed in this court do not raise any constitutional questions.

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OCHOA v. STATE
(Feb 21, 1968)