Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Kelly SCOTT, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary with two prior non-capital felony convictions alleged for enhancement; the punishment, life.

Appellant's attorney on appeal asserts as ground of error #1 that the trial court erred in admitting fingerprint comparison testimony. No objection was interposed at the time the identification officer testified, so nothing is presented for review. Barfield v. State, 43 S.W.2d 106; McCue v. State, 75 Tex.Crim. 137, 170 S.W. 280; Bonds v. State, 71 Tex.Crim. R., 160 S.W. 100; and Coleman v. State, 68 Tex.Crim. R., 150 S.W. 1177. See also Robles v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 411 S.W.2d 729.

He next contends that the court erred in his charge. No objections were presented to the trial court, and therefore, likewise, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCOTT v. STATE
(Mar 6, 1968)