Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Edward B. Reiter

Attorney and Client.

1. Where no answer in defense is filed, allegations of disbarment complaint are to be taken as confessed.

2. Conviction, on plea of guilty, for embezzlement warrants disbarment.

Per Curiam.

A complaint for disbarment has been presented against this respondent. It alleges that, in Chittenden County Court, he has pleaded guilty to, and been convicted and sentenced on eleven counts of embezzlement of funds entrusted to his care by others. The respondent has informed this Court that no answer in defense is to be filed. Therefore, the allegations of the complaint are to be taken as confessed. They establish that the respondent has violated his office as an attorney of this Court.

Judgment that Edward B. Reiter is removed from the office of attorney and counsellor at law and solicitor in chancery, and his name is stricken from the rolls.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE REITER
(Mar 14, 1968)