Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Robert Lee Davis appeals from a judgment entered after a non-jury trial convicting him of willfully failing to comply with an order to report for and submit to an Armed Forces physical and mental examination, in violation of 50 App. U.S.C. § 462 (a). 279 F. Supp. 920. Affirmed. John Cassidento, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn. (Jon O. Newman, U.S. Atty. for District of Connecticut, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for appellee. Ira B. Grudberg, New Haven, Conn. (Jacobs, Jacobs, Grudberg Clifford, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
Judges
  • Harold Raymond Medina
  • Leonard Page Moore
  • Robert Palmer Anderson
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Robert Lee Davis appeals from a judgment entered after a non-jury trial convicting him of willfully failing to comply with an order to report for and submit to an Armed Forces physical and mental examination, in violation of 50 App. U.S.C. § 462 (a). 279 F. Supp. 920. Affirmed. John Cassidento, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn. (Jon O. Newman, U.S. Atty. for District of Connecticut, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for appellee. Ira B. Grudberg, New Haven, Conn. (Jacobs, Jacobs, Grudberg Clifford, New Haven, Conn., on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
Judges
  • Harold Raymond Medina
  • Leonard Page Moore
  • Robert Palmer Anderson
See more information ...
Smart Summary

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert Lee DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm on the opinion of Judge Zampano below, 279 F. Supp. 920 (D. Conn. 1967). We merely add that United States v. Stepler, 258 F.2d 310 (3rd Cir. 1958), which is relied upon by appellant, is distinguishable principally because it involved unlawful action on the part of a Draft Board in classifying a registrant.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

UNITED STATES v. DAVIS
(Mar 6, 1968)