BRUNI v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Frank Thatcher argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Joseph R. Moss, attorney). Mr. Samuel Kalikman argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. George D. Rothermel, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Frank Thatcher argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Joseph R. Moss, attorney). Mr. Samuel Kalikman argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. George D. Rothermel, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ANNA A. BRUNI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OFAMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Carton in the Appellate Division, 100 N.J. Super. 154. For reversal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BRUNI v. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA

ANNA A. BRUNI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OFAMERICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments