Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PANTLIND HOTEL COMPANY v. STATE TAX COMMISSION.

ON REHEARING.

DETHMERS, J.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of Mr. Justice SOURIS in this case on its original hearing (1968), 380 Mich. 390, and my opinion on rehearing in Fisher-New Center Company v. State Tax Commission, 381 Mich. 713, in which the record and proceedings before the State tax commission are so markedly similar to those in the instant case, I would reverse and remand for rehearing before the State tax commission in accordance with the hearing procedures suggested in the SOURIS opinions in this case and in Fisher-New Center Company v. State Tax Commission (1969), 380 Mich. 340.

Costs to plaintiff.

T.E. BRENNAN, C.J., and KELLY, BLACK, JJ., concurred with DETHMERS, J.

T.M. KAVANAGH, J. (dissenting).

In this cause rehearing was granted May 6, 1968, Justices T.M. KAVANAGH, ADAMS, and T.E. BRENNAN dissenting. For the reasons set forth in the majority opinion of this Court in Pantlind Hotel Company v. State Tax Commission (1968), 380 Mich. 390, and in the opinion in Allied Supermarkets, Inc., v. State Tax Commission (1969), 381 Mich. 693, 696, we should affirm, on rehearing, the decisions (1) of the Court of Appeals with regard to the personal property assessment and (2) of the State tax commission with regard to the real property assessment.

Appellees should have costs of rehearing.

ADAMS, J., concurred with T.M. KAVANAGH, J.

T.G. KAVANAGH, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PANTLIND HOTEL CO. v. TAX COMM
(Apr 1, 1968)