Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Donald A. DIAZ, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The extensive and carefully considered opinion of the District Court, rendered pursuant to an evidentiary hearing, denying relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, has been published, 264 F. Supp. 937 (1967). The factual findings cannot be branded as clearly erroneous. We are in substantial agreement with the legal conclusions expounded. We, therefore, perceive nothing to be gained by super-imposing another opinion upon that which has already been written.

The Judgment appealed from is

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIAZ v. UNITED STATES
(Apr 2, 1968)