AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HAROLD TOOLEY, Respondent, v. HOWARD JOHNSON'S INCORPORATED et al., Appellants.

Order entered September 18, 1967, herein appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellants and the motion denied. The accident upon which the action for damages is based occurred in 1960. The case was noticed for trial in the Civil Court in 1964. Plaintiff allegedly discovered the claimed enlargement of injuries, the predicate for the motion to amend and to transfer, in May, 1966, but took no action for approximately 12 months thereafter. No reasonable excuse is offered for the delay ( Koi v. P.S. M. Catering Corp., 15 A.D.2d 775; Kind v. Serebreny Corp., 28 A.D.2d 988; de los Reyes v. United States Lines Co., 28 A.D.2d 991). Additionally, there is no affidavit of merits and there is insufficient to show a causal connection between the accident and the extensive injuries now asserted.

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Eager, Steuer, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOOLEY v. HOWARD JOHNSON'S INCORPORATED
(Apr 18, 1968)