Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of DOROTHY H. SCHWARTZ, Respondent, v. ISIDORE BOGEN et al., Constituting the Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Appellants.

Order modified and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs in the following memorandum: On oral argument, appellants stated that checklists, rather than standard answers, were used in rating essay parts of the examination. Therefore, the Appellate Division's order is modified to the extent of requiring appellants to furnish respondent with all materials used in determining the correctness or quality of the answers in the essay parts of the examination.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF SCHWARTZ v. BOGEN
(Apr 18, 1968)