Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Leonard A. Coyle argued the cause for
  • Mr. Bryan V. Moore argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Vincent Panaro, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Leonard A. Coyle argued the cause for
  • Mr. Bryan V. Moore argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Vincent Panaro, attorney).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL R. KOVACS,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, 100 N.J. Super. 310.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

STATE v. KOVACS
(May 6, 1968)