Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of NORTHVILLE DOCK PIPE LINE CORP., Appellant, v. L. LEON FANNING et al., Respondents.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Respondents contended that an interpretation of sections 80 and 81 of the Transportation Corporations Law, which would permit appellant to conduct a survey without an initial judicial determination that a public use would be served thereby, constitutes an impermissible invasion of property rights and an infringement of the due process clause of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals considered this contention and held that this was not a denial of respondents' constitutional rights.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE NORTHVILLE DOCK PIPE LINE CORP
(May 16, 1968)