Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DOLAN et ux., Plaintiffs and Respondents v. HUDSON et ux., Defendants, Cross-Complainants and Appellants

PER CURIAM:Page 332

After defendants' petition for rehearing was granted in this case further argument was heard. Having reconsidered arguments presented on rehearing, a majority of the court is not disposed to recede from the views expressed in the former opinion reported in 83 S.D. 144, 156 N.W.2d 78. We, therefore, adhere to that opinion and the judgment dated September 22, 1966 and the subsequent orders however denominated are hereby affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOLAN v. HUDSON v. DOLAN PFEIFER
(May 29, 1968)