Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CITY OF AKRON, APPELLANT v. SMITH; RIDDLE, JUDGE, APPELLEE.

Constitutional law — State's sovereignty over municipalities — Limitation of actions — Section 1905.33, Revised Code — Controls over municipal tax ordinance limitation — Prosecution for failure to file city income tax return.

1. The General Assembly may limit the time within which an action may be brought in the courts of this state, even where such action is based upon a municipal ordinance.

2. Such an ordinance may not provide for bringing such an action during a period of time greater than the limitation so specified by the General Assembly.

BROWN, J.

The question in this case, whether prosecution for the commission of the offense made punishable by the municipal ordinance is limited by the state statute, is answered in the affirmative by authority of the holding of this court in paragraphs one and two of the syllabus in State, ex rel. Ramey, v. Davis, 119 Ohio St. 596, which state:

"1. The sovereignty of the state in respect to its courts extends over all the state, including municipalities, whether governed by charter or general laws.

"2. None of the various provisions of Article XVIII of the Constitution of Ohio are effective to abridge the sovereignty of the state over municipalities in respect to its courts."

Thus, the General Assembly may limit the time within which an action may be brought in the courts of this state, even where such action is based upon a municipal ordinance. It follows that such an ordinance may not provide for bringing such an action during a period of time greater than the limitation so specified by the General Assembly.

Judgment affirmed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT and SCHNEIDER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AKRON v. SMITH
(May 29, 1968)