Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Motions
Attorney(S)

HARRY T. WHITLEY, Appellant, v. PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and BREITEL. Judges KEATING and JASEN dissent in part and vote to reverse and deny the motion for summary judgment in favor of the corporate defendant, Pacific Industries, Inc., in the following memorandum: We agree with the majority that plaintiff's affidavits are insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the individual defendants. As to the corporate defendant, however, issues are sufficiently stated to require a trial as to whether plaintiff's employment was one terminable at will.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITLEY v. PACIFIC INDUSTRIES
(Jun 5, 1968)