Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Alvin J. Rockwell (argued), John E. Sparks, of Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, Willis R. Deming, San Francisco, Cal., George D. Rives, of Rives Rodgers, Portland, Ore., for appellant. James L. Adams (argued), Edward M. Kovach, Thomas E. Kimball, Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for States Steamship Co. Allen van Emmerik (argued), Morton Hollander, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Carl Eardley, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for Secretary of Commerce. John F. Meadows, Admiralty Shipping Section, Department of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph D. Patello, San Diego, Cal., for San Diego Unified Port Dist.
Judges
  • Benjamin Cushing Duniway
  • Walter Raleigh Ely
  • William Matthew Byrne
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Alvin J. Rockwell (argued), John E. Sparks, of Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, Willis R. Deming, San Francisco, Cal., George D. Rives, of Rives Rodgers, Portland, Ore., for appellant. James L. Adams (argued), Edward M. Kovach, Thomas E. Kimball, Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for States Steamship Co. Allen van Emmerik (argued), Morton Hollander, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Carl Eardley, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D.C., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for Secretary of Commerce. John F. Meadows, Admiralty Shipping Section, Department of Justice, San Francisco, Cal., Joseph D. Patello, San Diego, Cal., for San Diego Unified Port Dist.
Judges
  • Benjamin Cushing Duniway
  • Walter Raleigh Ely
  • William Matthew Byrne
See more information ...
Smart Summary

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. John T. CONNOR, Secretary of Commerce, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Our examination of the record, the opinion of the Secretary, the briefs, the statutes and the applicable authorities leads us to the conclusion that the case was correctly decided by the District Court. Accordingly, and for the reasons stated by Judge Wollenberg in his opinion, Matson Nav. Co. v. Connor, D.C.N.D. Cal., 1966, 258 F. Supp. 144, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY v. CONNOR
(Jun 21, 1968)