Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LARRY MILLER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE. GARY RANDELL, APPELLANT,

MANN, Judge.

The only testimony relative to value during the trial of these defendants for grand larceny and breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit grand larceny is the following:

"Q. Would you tell the Jury what was missing?
A. A stereo, two TV's, a Hallicrafter ship-to-shore radio, a watch, some records.
Q. All right. And what value did you place on all of this?
A. Eight hundred.
Q. Eight hundred dollars?
A. (Witness nodded affirmatively.)"

This is insufficient. Suarez v. State, 136 So.2d 367 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1962).

The other points raised by appellants are without merit. Pursuant to Florida Statutes § 924.34 (1967), F.S.A., judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded with instruction to enter judgment of conviction on the lesser included offenses and to pass sentence accordingly.

LILES, C.J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. STATE
(Jun 28, 1968)