AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP., Appellant, v. John SEDLACSIK, Jr., and Interplanetary Research De

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In this civil action brought pursuant to the provisions of 35 U.S.C.A. § 146 for determination of priority of invention, the District Court, to which trial was had, affirmed the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences on its finding that the plaintiff failed to discharge its burden of proof to establish "a thorough conviction that a mistake had been made" by the Board. Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U.S. 120, 14 S.Ct. 772, 38 L.Ed. 657 (1894); Radio Corporation of America v. International Standard Electric Corporation, 232 F.2d 726 (3 Cir. 1956).

On review of the record we cannot say that the District Court's finding was "clearly erroneous" under Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and accordingly the Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RANSBURG ELECTRO-COATING CORP. v. SEDLACSIK
(Jul 5, 1968)