Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Clyde F. LEE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented on this appeal are controlled by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62, 88 S.Ct. 709, 19 L. Ed.2d 906 (1968), and Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). In view of these decisions, without necessity of further comment, it is clear that the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must be reversed. See Peters v. Rutledge, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.2d 731 [June 6, 1968]; Scaglione v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 219; Vouras v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 393 F.2d 936 [May 3, 1968]; Leonard v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F.2d 586; Motley v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F.2d 590; Boehm v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 392 F.2d 978; Sklaroff v. United States (5 Cir. 1968) 389 F.2d 1004.

Reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEE v. UNITED STATES
(Jul 16, 1968)