UNITED STATES v. MAURO

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 10, Docket 32255.

Attorney(S)

Irving Anolik, New York City (Michael P. Direnzo, New York City, on the brief), for
Arthur A. Munisteri,
U.S.
(Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S.
for Southern District of New York, Leonard M. Marks,
U.S.
, on the brief), for

Judges

Joseph Edward Lumbard
Robert Palmer Anderson
John Joseph Smith

Acts

Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Habeas Corpus — Particular Proceedings — Federal Custody; Remedies On Motion Attacking Sentence

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 10, Docket 32255.

Attorney(S)

Irving Anolik, New York City (Michael P. Direnzo, New York City, on the brief), for
Arthur A. Munisteri,
U.S.
(Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S.
for Southern District of New York, Leonard M. Marks,
U.S.
, on the brief), for

Judges

Joseph Edward Lumbard
Robert Palmer Anderson
John Joseph Smith

Acts

Judiciary And Judicial Procedure — Habeas Corpus — Particular Proceedings — Federal Custody; Remedies On Motion Attacking Sentence

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent MAURO, Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the judgment of the district court which denied Mauro's motion to vacate, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the judgment of his conviction for violation of the narcotics laws, substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Croake's opinion reported, sub nom. United States v. Caruso et al., D.C., 280 F. Supp. 371 (1967).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Vincent MAURO, Appellant.

Comments