AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUSCON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ACROW CAROLINA, INC., Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The issues which arose in this case between a general contractor and his subcontractor are chiefly factual. There was conflict in the evidence which the District Judge resolved in a manner substantially supported in the record. We cannot say that his findings are clearly erroneous, and we find no error in the interpretation of the contract between the parties or other error of law.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSCON CONSTR. CORP. v. ACROW CAROLINA, INC
(Nov 4, 1968)