Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CARL L. RUFFIN

Criminal Law 161 — effect of appeal An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper.

Defendant was indicted by bill of indictment, proper in form, for the crime of escape from the State Prison System while serving a sentence for larceny, which is a felony. Defendant, through his court-appointed counsel, pleaded guilty. After examining the defendant the trial court determined and adjudged that the plea of guilty had been freely, understandingly and voluntarily made and without any undue influence, compulsion or duress, and without promise of leniency or reward. Judgment was thereupon entered, sentencing defendant to prison for six months, this sentence to run consecutively with the sentence which had previously been imposed upon defendant for larceny. Defendant appealed.

PARKER, J.

There is no assignment of error in the record, appellant's court appointed counsel frankly submitting that he is of the opinion that no prejudicial error was committed in this case but requesting this Court to review the same. An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. 1 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, 26, p. 152. We have carefully reviewed the record proper, and find the bill of indictment proper in form, the plea of guilty freely and voluntarily entered, and the sentence imposed to be within statutory limits. G.S. 148-45.

We find

No error.

BROCK and BRITT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RUFFIN
(Dec 1, 1968)