Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JOHN WALKOVSZKY, Respondent, v. WILLIAM CARLTON, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: The complaint before us — amended following our decision when the case was previously here ( 18 N.Y.2d 414) — now meets the pleading requirements set forth in the court's opinion and states a valid cause of action. It is hardly necessary to add that we pass only upon the sufficiency of the complaint and that it will be incumbent upon the plaintiff, if he is to succeed, to prove upon the trial the truth and correctness of his allegations. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING, BREITEL and JASEN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALKOVSZKY v. CARLTON
(Nov 27, 1968)