Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Angelicchio Motor Vehicle Operator License Case.

Motor Vehicles — Licenses — Operation — Speed — Economic hardship — Other circumstances.

1. Lucchetti Motor Vehicle Operator License Case, 213 Pa. Super. 397, Held controlling.

2. In this case, in which it appeared that the driver, seventeen years of age, in possession of a junior operator's license, was apprehended for operating a car at a speed of 80 miles per hour in a 60 mile-per-hour speed zone, and paid a fine to a justice of the peace; that, after hearing, the Secretary of Revenue suspended the operator's privilege for a period of four months; that the driving record of the operator disclosed a previous speeding violation, when he was sixteen years of age, for which offense he had received a suspension of six months; and that the court below, finding that the operator needed his driving license to enable him to work and earn his livelihood, and that there was no showing of adverse road conditions or particularly heavy traffic at the time of his arrest, or any recklessness on his part, reversed the action of the secretary, and directed that the operator's privilege be restored; it was Held that the order of the court below should be reversed, and the order of the secretary reinstated.

Argued November 13, 1968.

OPINION BY WRIGHT, P.J., December 12, 1968:

On October 3, 1966, at 11:40 P.M., Allen P. Angelicchio was apprehended for operating a Chevrolet sedan westbound on Route 30 near Greensburg at a speed of 80 miles per hour in a 60 mile-per-hour speed zone. On that date Angelicchio was seventeen years of age and was in possession of a junior operator's license. His driving record disclosed a previous speeding violation on March 28, 1966, when he was sixteen years of age, for which offense he received a suspension of six months. An information was filed before a justice of the peace and, on November 17, 1966, Angelicchio paid the fine and costs. On April 18, 1968, after hearing, the Secretary of Revenue suspended Angelicchio's operating privilege for a period of four months. On September 6, 1968, the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County reversed the action of the Secretary of Revenue, and directed that Angelicchio's operating privilege be restored. This appeal by the Commonwealth followed.

Although Angelicchio's offense occurred after the effective date (July 24, 1966) of the amendment to The Vehicle Code establishing the point system, the action of the Secretary of Revenue in ordering a suspension, rather than the assignment of points, was proper under the provisions of Section 604.1 (75 P.S. 604.1) which authorizes suspension of the driving privilege of a junior operator convicted of speeding or any other violation.

The hearing judge reasoned that appellant "needed his driving license to enable him to work and earn his livelihood. There was no showing of adverse road conditions nor particularly heavy traffic at the time of his arrest. There was no recklessness involved in the conduct of the petitioner". This appeal is controlled by our opinion filed this day in Lucchetti Motor Vehicle Operator License Case, 213 Pa. Super. 397, 249 A.2d 783.

The order of the court below is reversed, and the order of the Secretary of Revenue is reinstated.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ANGELICCHIO MOTOR VEH. OP. LIC. CASE
(Dec 12, 1968)