Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DIVISION OF PENSIONS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. HARRY W. LINDEMAN,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Herbert in the Chancery Division, 103 N.J. Super. 375.

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIVISION OF PENSIONS v. LINDEMAN
(Dec 23, 1968)