AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ANTHONY CATAPANO et al., Appellants, v. ARLENE FRANCIS et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant. (And Another Title.)

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 20, 1965, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion it was error to receive in evidence, over appellants' objection, the self-serving written statement of defendant Francis, which was made 24 days after the accident. We consider this error sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial. Beldock, P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CATAPANO v. FRANCIS
(Dec 23, 1968)