Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Robert FOUST and Albina Foust, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Bernard BUFFORD, Defendant-Respondent.

McQUADE, Justice.

This case involves the same undisputed facts which formed the basis of Foust v. Birds Eye Division of General Foods Corp., 91 Idaho 418, 422 P.2d 616 (1967), except that here the Fousts have sued Bufford, Mrs. Foust's then fellow employee. The decision of the district court below, granting Bufford's motion for summary judgment on the basis that he was as a matter of law acting in the course of his employment, is affirmed on the authority of the first Foust case, supra, and the numerous authorities cited therein.

Judgment affirmed. Costs to respondent.

McFADDEN, SPEAR, JJ., and FELTON, DONALDSON, D.JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOUST v. BUFFORD
(Dec 24, 1968)