Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor, State-Mart, Inc.
Judges
  • James Robert Browning
  • Benjamin Cushing Duniway
Acts
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Michael N. Sohn, Washington, D.C., (argued) and Thomas Silfen, Washington, D.C., Paul A. Cassady, Director, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Charles M. Arak, (argued), Robert M. Dohrmann, (argued) of Arnold, Smith Schwartz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Ted R. Frame, (argued), of Frame Courtney, Coalinga, Cal., for intervenor, State-Mart, Inc.
Judges
  • James Robert Browning
  • Benjamin Cushing Duniway
Acts
See more information ...
Smart Summary

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNION NO. 899, AFL-CIO, et al., Respondents.

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement of its order entered on July 23, 1967. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 166 N.L.R.B. No. 92. The trial examiner found that respondent union had violated section 8(b)(7)(C) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b) (7)(C), by picketing stores of an unorganized employer for more than 30 days, without filing an election petition and with a proscribed recognitional objective. The Board adopted the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the examiner. We are persuaded that those findings and conclusions are correct.

The order will be enforced.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

N.L.R.B. v. RETAIL CLERKS INTERNAT'L ASS'N
(Dec 18, 1968)