AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the defendant brought itself into sufficient compliance. Despite this, the plaintiff presses its contention that the orders were valid when made and were properly upheld in the Appellate Division, and that the defendant's appeal should therefore now be rejected. We agree and affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Goldmann in his comprehensive opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 100 N.J. Super. 366 ( App. Div. 1968).

Affirmed. For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP
(Feb 3, 1969)