Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PREZZATO v. LININGTON

PER CURIAM.

This civil action was brought by plaintiffs, Prezzato, against appellee, Linington, for damages resulting from the alleged negligent operation of defendant's motor vehicle.

Following a jury trial, a unanimous verdict of no cause of action was rendered. Subsequently a motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict or for new trial was heard and denied. Plaintiffs appeal.

An examination of the record and briefs discloses evidence sufficient to support the verdict. There is no showing of an abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying plaintiffs' motion for new trial which would constitute reversible error. Oppenheim v. Rattner (1967) 6 Mich. App. 554.

Affirmed.

FITZGERALD, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and BRONSON, JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PREZZATO v. LININGTON
(Jan 28, 1969)