WILLIS v. SECURITY INSURANCE GROUP, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Michael Patrick King argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants Charles F. Willis and Allstate Insurance Company, and for defendant and third-party plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant Allstate Insurance Company ( Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan Montano, attorneys). Mr. Michael A. Orlando argued the cause for defendant-appellant and cross-respondent Security Insurance Group ( Messrs. Orlando Cummins, attorneys). Mr. Sidney P. McCord argued the cause for third-party defendant-appellant and cross-respondent Universal Underwriter's Insurance Co. ( Messrs. McCord, Farrell, Eynon Munyon, attorneys). Mr. Stephen E. Barcan argued the cause for New Jersey Automobile Dealers Association as amicus curiae ( Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman Spitzer, attorneys).

Judges

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CHARLES F. WILLIS AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS ANDCROSS-APPELLANTS, v. SECURITY INSURANCE GROUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ANDCROSS-RESPONDENT.JOSEPH NACHTRIEB, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgments are affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Wick in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, in Willis v. Security Insurance Group, 104 N.J. Super. 410 ( Ch. Div. 1968).

Nachtrieb v. Allstate Insurance Company was decided by Judge Wick in an oral opinion within a few days of Willis v. Security Insurance Group. The basic issues are the same and in our view are controlled by the decision announced in Willis. See also, American Motorists Insurance Company v. Kaplan, 209 Va. 53, 161 S.E.2d 675 (1968).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — None.

WILLIS v. SECURITY INSURANCE GROUP

CHARLES F. WILLIS AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS ANDCROSS-APPELLANTS, v. SECURITY INSURANCE GROUP, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ANDCROSS-RESPONDENT.JOSEPH NACHTRIEB, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

Comments