IN RE ESTATE OF CALIGUIRE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Robert J. Carluccio argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant. Mr. Robert J. Wall argued the cause for defendant-respondent ( Mr. Thomas J. Kilcoyne, on the brief).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Robert J. Carluccio argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant. Mr. Robert J. Wall argued the cause for defendant-respondent ( Mr. Thomas J. Kilcoyne, on the brief).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

HAROLD CALIGUIRE, AS ADMINISTRATOR AD PROSEQUENDUM FOR THE ESTATE OF VINCENTCALIGUIRE AND HAROLD CALIGUIRE, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITYOF UNION CITY IN THE COUNTY OF HUDSON, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATEOF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons given in the majority opinion 104 N.J. Super. 210 ( App. Div. 1967).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.