Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (
  • Warren, Chasan, Leyner Holland, attorneys). Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for defendant, third-party plaintiff-respondent Vincent Krasnica (
  • Keale, Tarrant
  • Tarlton, attorneys).
Judges
  • The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Lewis M. Holland argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants (
  • Warren, Chasan, Leyner Holland, attorneys). Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for defendant, third-party plaintiff-respondent Vincent Krasnica (
  • Keale, Tarrant
  • Tarlton, attorneys).
Judges
  • The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

FRANCIS MAGRINE AND ALFRED MAGRINE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DAVID SPECTOR,d/b/a PRECISION BUR COMPANY AND E.P. KEANE, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a KEANEDENTAL SUPPLY, DEFENDANTS.VINCENT KRASNICA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Lynch, 94 N.J. Super. 228 ( Cty. Ct. 1967), and in the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, 100 N.J. Super. 223 ( App. Div. 1968).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

MAGRINE v. SPECTOR, ET AL
(Feb 18, 1969)