Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KRAJEWSKI v. BOMMARITO

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff brought action against defendants for malicious prosecution and conspiracy to commit malicious prosecution. At the close of the proofs, defendants moved for a directed verdict, which was denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and defendants moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The trial court denied the motion, but did order a remittitur.

The trial was fair and impartial, the issues of law were properly considered and decided by the trial court, and the issues of fact were submitted to the jury with proper instructions.

The questions of fact, having been decided adversely to the defendant by the jury, provide no grounds for reversal unless there is substantial error.

A review of the record does not indicate such error, and the judgment of the trial court should be sustained.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KRAJEWSKI v. BOMMARITO
(Feb 26, 1969)