Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v. EINEDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant contends his jury conviction for taking possession and driving away a motor vehicle, under CL 1948, § 750.413 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.645), denied him equal protection of the law. He argues that two statutes of unequal penalties apply to the same crime, the other statute being CL 1948, § 750.414 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.646). Thus, defendant contends he was subject to the arbitrary choice of the prosecutor as to which statute to apply.

In People v. Ryan (1968), 11 Mich. App. 559, this Court resolved defendant's argument by holding that the statutory crimes are distinct. The prosecutor may use his discretion in proceeding under either statute. The facts encompassed the crime charged, and therefore, the prosecutor did not abuse his discretion.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. EINEDER
(Feb 27, 1969)