Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Mercedes DICKERSON v. Arthur HODGE, Appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in a suit brought to settle the location of the boundary line between Lots 9 and 8A Adel Gade in King's Quarter of the town of Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, owned, respectively, by the plaintiff and the defendant. The district court reviewed the facts and concluded that the true boundary between the lots was that contended for by the plaintiff and shown on a survey plan dated November 3, 1956, prepared by Sidney Baptiste, surveyor. We find ourselves in complete accord with the findings and conclusions of the district court as stated in its opinion to which we need add nothing.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DICKERSON v. HODGE
(Mar 10, 1969)