CITY OF PATERSON v. THE PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for appellant. Mr. John W. Griggs argued the cause for respondent Paterson General Hospital ( Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd Griggs, attorneys; Mr. Richard J. Ryan, on the brief). Mr. Joseph L. Conn and Mr. Arthur C. Dwyer argued the cause for respondent City of Paterson ( Mr. Conn, attorney; Mr. Dwyer, of counsel). Mr. Kenneth M. Olex argued the cause for respondent Attorney General ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CITY OF PATERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL,ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.WILLIAM F. FORBES, ET AL., INTERVENING PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM.

A petition for certification was filed to review the judgment of the Appellate Division approving a settlement of the litigation. We heard argument on the application as if certification was granted. The petition for certification is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed upon the agreement of the respondents that paragraph 5 of the contract does not mean that the Paterson General Hospital will be relieved, by virtue of that contract, of all obligation to the people of the City of Paterson at the end of the 20-year period mentioned in that paragraph.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

CITY OF PATERSON v. THE PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL

CITY OF PATERSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE PATERSON GENERAL HOSPITAL,ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.WILLIAM F. FORBES, ET AL., INTERVENING PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

Comments