Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

D. DAVIS COMPANY et al. v. PLUNKETT et al.

EBERHARDT, Judge.

The appeal in this case is taken from an order sustaining the motion of a third-party defendant to dismiss the third-party complaint. The order reads: "After hearing, motion of third party defendant to dismiss for want of jurisdiction and venue is sustained and the third party complaint is abated and dismissed."

Since the order adjudicating less than all the claims does not provide for the entry of a final judgment as to the third-party defendant "upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment" as provided by CPA § 54 (b) ( Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b)), and since there is no certificate as provided for by the 1968 amendment to the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1073; Code Ann. § 6-701 (2)), there is no appealable judgment. Accordingly, the appeal must be

Dismissed. Felton, C. J., and Whitman, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 3, 1968 — DECIDED MARCH 26, 1969.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS COMPANY v. PLUNKETT
(Mar 26, 1969)