HOOD RIVER CO. v. NORTHERN PACIFIC | Case No. 2207 | Or. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

AMICUS AI

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Case No. 2207

Attorney(S)

William B. Wyllie, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten Speerstra,
Carl R. Neil, Portland, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Lindsay, Nahstoll, Hart, DaFoe Krause, Portland,
John A. Jelderks, District Attorney, Hood

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Case No. 2207

Attorney(S)

William B. Wyllie, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten Speerstra,
Carl R. Neil, Portland, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Lindsay, Nahstoll, Hart, DaFoe Krause, Portland,
John A. Jelderks, District Attorney, Hood

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

HOOD RIVER COUNTY, Respondent, v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL, Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

This case is identical to that of Hood River County v. Western Tree Farms, Inc. et al, 252 Or. 51, 448 P.2d 519, and Western Tree Farms, Inc. v. Hood River County, 252 Or. 47, 448 P.2d 518, 252 Or. 49, 448 P.2d 519, decided December 11, 1968.

Defendants seek the overruling of Hood River County v. Dabney, 1967, 246 Or. 14, 423 P.2d 954. This we have declined to do.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments