AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JANET L. HIGGINS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICALPATHOLOGISTS, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

This case is before us for the second time. On the plaintiff's appeal we reversed the judgment of the Appellate Division in favor of the defendant and remanded the matter to the Law Division. 51 N.J. 191 (1968). On plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the defendant offered no proof in resistance. Accordingly, the proof stood as described in our opinion. Therefore, the trial court properly entered summary judgment for the plaintiff. We add that the line of proof suggested at the argument before us, that the plaintiff suffered no economic loss, is irrelevant.

Affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HIGGINS v. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGISTS
(Apr 7, 1969)